Business Negotiation, Negotiation Strategies August 8, 2025
What Is Slicing the Salami in Negotiation? | KARRASSIn negotiation, the most dangerous concessions are often the ones that seem too small to matter. That’s the essence of “slicing the salami,” a classic tactic where one side gradually extracts multiple small concessions—each seemingly insignificant on its own—until the cumulative effect significantly favors their position. It’s a subtle, strategic approach that works because it rarely triggers resistance in the moment.
Understanding how this tactic works is essential for any negotiator who wants to avoid being outmaneuvered. As Dr. Chester L. Karrass often emphasized, “You have more power than you think,” but only if you recognize what’s happening across the negotiating table.
The phrase "slicing the salami" comes from the idea of cutting a large salami into very thin slices, taking a little at a time so the overall loss is difficult to detect. In negotiation, this tactic refers to the method of breaking down one large concession into several smaller ones to avoid resistance. Because each “slice” seems reasonable on its own, the person giving them away may not realize how much value they’ve lost until it’s too late. The brilliance of this tactic lies in its subtlety—it masks accumulation through fragmentation.
Rather than making one bold ask, a salami slicer makes a series of small, continuous requests throughout the negotiation. For example, instead of negotiating a 10% discount outright, a buyer may first ask for a price reduction, then for free delivery, then for faster turnaround, and so on. Each individual ask is framed as minor or routine, but collectively they shift the value of the deal significantly. The tactic relies on patience, persistence, and the assumption that most people won’t push back on a string of seemingly harmless adjustments.
This tactic is common because it flies under the radar. Most people are socially conditioned to agree to reasonable requests, especially if the negotiation seems close to resolution. A well-timed small ask can seem like a natural part of “finalizing the deal,” and because many professionals focus more on major issues than incremental ones, these smaller asks often go uncontested. That’s what makes this tactic so powerful—and so important to identify and manage early.
Incrementalism is the psychological principle that people are more likely to accept change when it happens in small, gradual steps. In negotiation, this is exploited through salami slicing—each small concession is too minor to trigger alarm, but together they represent a major shift. Negotiators may say “yes” to a dozen tiny requests they would have refused outright if asked all at once. This tactic works because it keeps people feeling in control, even as their position is slowly eroded.
When each slice is framed as a modest, mutual give-and-take, the other party often feels cooperative rather than defensive. The illusion of fairness encourages participation in what feels like an equitable process. But fairness in perception doesn’t always match fairness in outcome—especially when only one side is doing the giving. That’s why it’s essential to track concessions carefully and evaluate them in aggregate, not just individually.
Long negotiations often lead to decision fatigue, which lowers a person's ability to assess and resist small requests. As mental energy dwindles, people become more likely to agree to “just one more thing” to keep the deal moving forward. This is where salami slicing thrives—when the other side is too tired, rushed, or distracted to notice what they’re giving away. Dr. Karrass advised negotiators to avoid pressure and fatigue traps because that’s where mistakes multiply and deals become lopsided.
In procurement, a buyer may agree to the vendor’s pricing, then proceed to request small “add-ons” like extended payment terms, expedited shipping, or additional support—none of which were included in the initial agreement. Vendors may comply with each ask to keep the relationship positive, not realizing how much profitability they’re conceding. Over time, the list of “little extras” becomes long, and the vendor’s margins shrink. What looked like a fair deal at the outset ends up heavily skewed toward the buyer.
In corporate negotiations, especially for service contracts or licensing agreements, the slicing tactic often appears late in the process. After most of the terms are locked in, one party begins asking for slight tweaks—a longer grace period here, a looser SLA there, a minor customization. Each change seems too small to derail the deal, and the negotiating team may be too invested to say no. But these tweaks can collectively alter the value and complexity of the agreement in profound ways.
Real estate deals and B2B sales often showcase the tactic in action. A buyer might agree to a property’s asking price but then begin chipping away at costs—asking the seller to pay closing costs, include furniture, fix inspection items, or delay the move-in date. Similarly, in B2B, clients might agree to a proposal and then request additions after the fact: extra users, longer warranties, or bundled services. Each request sounds reasonable in isolation, but taken together, they can shift the deal far off its original terms.
One of the most effective elements of the salami tactic is the perception that each request is harmless. People are far more likely to agree to small asks than large ones, especially if the request seems like a natural next step. This plays into our tendency to avoid conflict over “minor” issues and creates a slippery slope of compliance. Over time, those small asks accumulate, reshaping the agreement in a way the other party never fully intended to allow.
Each small concession appears proportionate and reasonable—until you step back and consider the entire picture. The illusion of fairness is powerful because the person giving up value often feels like they are engaging in a balanced process. But when one side is doing most of the giving, fairness becomes a mirage. This cumulative advantage is how salami slicing shifts negotiations incrementally but significantly toward one party’s favor.
Negotiation is not only about individual concessions—it’s about the balance of the overall deal. Without tracking each give-and-take, negotiators may unknowingly shift their position until they’ve lost leverage entirely. As Dr. Karrass taught, “The best negotiators are prepared.” That includes staying alert to subtle trends, not just obvious moves, and recognizing that a lot of little concessions can amount to one very big one.
If you notice a pattern of requests that keep emerging after each agreement, you may be dealing with salami slicing. These requests often appear at moments of transition—just before closing a deal, after agreeing to pricing, or during final contract edits. The tone remains friendly and collaborative, which can disguise the tactical nature of the approach. But if the frequency of these small asks increases without equivalent offers in return, it’s a red flag.
Another clue is the lack of reciprocity. A skilled negotiator trades concessions; a salami slicer simply keeps asking. If the other party never offers meaningful value in return but instead chips away at your position over time, you’re likely facing this tactic. Keep a running list of what’s been requested and what’s been granted—patterns reveal themselves more clearly in writing.
It’s easy to brush off a $100 request here or an extra clause there—until you realize you’ve given away thousands in value or weeks of additional responsibility. Slicing the salami works best when the recipient is focused on finishing the deal, not protecting its structure. Once you see how the pieces fit together, you can pause the process and reassess. That’s how experienced negotiators maintain control even when the other party is applying pressure incrementally.
Preparation is your strongest defense against salami slicing. Before you enter any negotiation, know what concessions you can afford to make, what must remain firm, and what your walk-away point is. This mental framework prevents you from being caught off guard by a cascade of small asks. Dr. Karrass emphasized that power in negotiation comes from preparation—not just in knowing your facts, but in anticipating the other side’s tactics.
Begin negotiations by establishing what is on and off the table. If you're firm about scope and timelines early, it becomes easier to flag later requests as out of bounds. This doesn’t mean being rigid—it means being intentional. When the other party knows you’re tracking each adjustment carefully, they’re less likely to push for extras.
Every concession should be exchanged, not gifted. When the other side asks for something—no matter how small—respond with a trade: “We can extend the payment terms, but we’ll need a signed agreement by Friday.” This reinforces that your position has value and discourages a steady stream of one-sided requests. As Dr. Karrass put it, “Concessions should be traded, not given.”
If you suspect salami slicing, zoom out. Ask, “If I agree to all of these, what does the entire deal look like now?” This mental exercise helps you recalibrate and identify whether the cumulative value still works for you. Don’t be afraid to re-anchor the discussion or reset expectations based on the broader picture.
Dr. Chester L. Karrass believed that negotiation isn’t about manipulation—it’s about understanding the process and using it with intelligence and integrity. Being able to recognize tactics like slicing the salami gives you the power to stay grounded and respond strategically rather than reactively. Once you identify a pattern, you’re no longer playing defense—you’re back in control. The best negotiators don’t just know tactics; they know when those tactics are being used on them.
When caught up in the details, it’s easy to lose sight of the big picture. But negotiation is not a checklist—it’s a relationship, a strategy, and a balance of value over time. Dr. Karrass taught that successful negotiators consider both short-term wins and long-term consequences. Keeping your eye on total value helps ensure that the salami-slicer doesn’t walk away with more than their fair share.
Negotiation isn’t about saying no to everything. It’s about managing the flow of yes and no with intention. The key is to evaluate each ask and respond with purpose—ideally by securing something in return. Strategic negotiators treat every concession as currency, not charity, and never let the other side dictate the pace without scrutiny.
The nibble tactic—asking for something small after the deal is nearly done—is a cousin to slicing the salami, but with a crucial difference. Nibbling is typically one ask, made at the final moment to secure a tiny extra without risking the deal. Slicing the salami, on the other hand, is a repeated tactic, applied throughout the negotiation process to achieve a cumulative advantage. Recognizing which tactic is being used helps you decide whether to hold the line or counter with a trade.
Some skilled negotiators blend tactics to mask their intentions. A salami-slicing approach might be softened by a “good cop” who makes the requests seem more palatable—or paired with an extreme anchor that makes each small ask seem like a step toward compromise. Tactics are rarely used in isolation. The most successful negotiators, as Dr. Karrass taught, are those who stay alert to combinations and sequences, not just individual moves.
If you feel like you’re being maneuvered from multiple directions—subtle asks, shifting deadlines, changes in tone—it may be a sign that more than one tactic is at play. In these moments, slow the process down and reassess the dynamic. Compound strategies are designed to create confusion and imbalance, but clarity and calm are your tools for regaining control. Awareness turns the advantage back in your favor.
Like many tactics, slicing the salami walks a fine line between effective strategy and unethical manipulation. Used too aggressively or without transparency, it can damage trust and derail negotiations. Smart negotiators know that while this tactic can win concessions in the short term, it may burn bridges in the long run. When your counterpart catches on, they may withdraw, retaliate, or refuse to negotiate with you again.
Every negotiation builds a foundation for future interactions. If the other party feels taken advantage of—even subtly—they’re less likely to work with you again or to do so in good faith. Salami slicing can create resentment when the full impact of the tactic becomes clear. Dr. Karrass emphasized that “negotiation is not a battle but a process,” and processes built on trust produce the best long-term outcomes.
Being transparent doesn’t mean giving away your strategy—it means managing the relationship with integrity. You can still be strategic and assertive while remaining honest about your priorities. Skilled negotiators know that a fair deal for both sides builds reputation and influence. Overusing tricks may yield short-term wins, but at the cost of long-term power.
Slicing the salami can be used constructively if you’re transparent about your intentions and maintain fairness. For instance, if you genuinely need multiple adjustments due to evolving business needs, framing them clearly and offering reciprocal value helps preserve trust. The tactic becomes unethical when it’s used to conceal your true objectives or when it’s designed to exploit fatigue and inattention. Dr. Karrass always championed honest, thoughtful negotiation—where strategy is applied with clarity and purpose.
A good-faith example might include a software buyer requesting post-sale support, followed by an implementation roadmap, and then training—each negotiated openly and tied to specific value exchanges. The buyer isn’t hiding their intentions; they’re simply building out the deal incrementally with clear communication and consideration for the seller. When used this way, the tactic becomes part of a structured negotiation, not a manipulative ploy.
To stay ethical, evaluate not only what you’re asking for, but how and when. If your requests are designed to avoid scrutiny or to bypass trade-offs, it may be time to reassess your approach. In good-faith bargaining, both sides remain aware of the process and agree to move forward with eyes open. That’s the kind of negotiation that builds strong agreements—and stronger reputations.
Preparation isn’t just a checklist—it’s a mindset. Dr. Karrass taught that every negotiation should begin long before the first meeting, with a clear understanding of your objectives, limits, and alternatives. When you’re prepared, you’re more likely to recognize subtle tactics like salami slicing and respond strategically rather than emotionally. Preparation puts you in the driver’s seat, no matter what tricks the other side may use.
One of the simplest but most powerful tools in your arsenal is a concession log. Keeping track of what you’ve given, what you’ve asked for, and what’s been agreed to can reveal patterns you might otherwise miss. When you review this log mid-negotiation, you may find that a series of “small” adjustments has altered the entire deal. This kind of tracking ensures you stay informed and alert to gradual erosion of your position.
When you plan thoroughly, you gain the confidence to say no when needed—and the clarity to know when yes is the better option. Planning helps you prioritize what matters most, so you don’t waste time debating over low-value issues or get distracted by tactical noise. It also gives you the leverage to counter with trades rather than concessions, reinforcing your credibility. As Dr. Karrass emphasized, “In business as in life, you don’t get what you deserve—you get what you negotiate.”
“Slicing the salami” is a negotiation tactic where one party requests a series of small concessions over time instead of asking for a large one all at once. These minor asks often seem too insignificant to resist, but they add up to a major shift in the final deal. The goal is to gradually erode the other party’s position without triggering resistance. It’s a tactic based on subtlety and patience rather than confrontation.
Not inherently. Like many negotiation tactics, it depends on how it’s used. If done transparently and with fair exchanges, it can be a legitimate method for building a deal piece by piece. But when it’s used to conceal intentions, exploit fatigue, or secure value without reciprocity, it crosses into unethical territory—and can damage long-term trust and reputation.
Start by preparing thoroughly and keeping a detailed record of concessions and requests. Watch for patterns of repeated small asks, especially if they come after agreements seem settled. Always evaluate new requests in the context of the full deal, not just on their own. And most importantly, don’t give away value—trade it for something you need.
Yes. When used with transparency and fairness, slicing the salami can help negotiate complex deals in stages. If each request is framed honestly and matched with a concession or benefit for the other party, the process remains collaborative. The key is mutual understanding and agreement—not manipulation. Ethical negotiators stay aware of power dynamics and strive for win-win outcomes.
Slicing the salami is one of the most enduring negotiation tactics because it plays on subtlety, psychology, and timing. But the more you understand it, the less power it holds over you. By recognizing the signs, preparing thoughtfully, and managing each concession with care, you can maintain control of the negotiation and protect the value of your deal. As Dr. Karrass often said, “You have more power than you think”—especially when you understand the process and stay prepared.
More than 1.5 million people have trained with KARRASS over the last 55 years. Effective Negotiating® is designed to work for all job titles and job descriptions, for the world’s largest companies and individual businesspeople.
Effective Negotiating® is offered In-Person in a city near you, or Live-Online from our Virtual Studios to your computer. See the complete schedule here.
EFFECTIVE NEGOTIATING II® LIVE ONLINE
EFFECTIVE NEGOTIATING® LIVE ONLINE
RELATED ARTICLES
Have questions or need assistance? Reach out to our team